Skip to content

Another Round of What About the MENZZZZZZZZZZZ 20,000,000,000,000

July 10, 2009

Queen Emily, born and raised a king with a king’s attitude asks the male-dominated menz-first populace of Feministe a question (well not really a question but a thinly disguised what about the menz whine:

To [FAB] feminists, when you are building new resources, what do you gain by excluding [MTF-F].  Is that gain worth the harm you cause [MTF-F]  Is that not status quo with the rest of the patriarchal world – to see [MTF-F]  as disposable, valueless and not worthy of protecting – and shouldn’t feminism be doing better?

Perhaps the question should be when men are building new resources what do they gain by excluding men who want their delusions indulged? Of course men are not going to give a fuck about women, evident by how the very men who are now parading around as women don’t care one bit that their indulged delusions are draining resources from female at birth women. That is what is status quo, men expecting women to serve them before they serve other women.

It is a patriarchy. Men are in power. Men control most of the resources in North America. Men murder for resources. Men murder when resources are denied them. Men start wars to dominate resources.

What feminist worth her salt would elect to take the already minuscule crumbs wrestled from the arms of men and spend it on other men?

It seems that MTF-Fs have not learned yet, that women were not born to service them. Instead of demanding that the thousands and thousands of pharmacies across North America accommodate them (which they all do serve men already), the MTF-Fs focus their hostile attacks on the first women’s only pharmacy. Entitlement and privilege know no bounds.

Assholes.

11 Comments
  1. July 10, 2009 6:50 am

    Re: the first women’s only pharmacy

    “Women felt, ‘I want a woman pharmacist. I want to know that when I walk in the door, I’m going to be getting sound women-centred care from a pharmacist. I can talk to her about emergency contraception or a vaginal infection, something that is very personal and intimate,'”

    So how big is the delusion when MTFs think they need emergency contraception or treatment for a vaginal infection (of the regular, not constructed, variety)?

    Wouldn’t the MTFs be better served by a MTF pharamacist? One who knows specifically about MTF problems (like constructed vaginas)? Surely out of all the MTFs, there must be one who is a pharmacist?

    Why is being an MTF supposed to be like a FAB medically? How many MTFs suffer from horrendous period pain? Yeast infections? Missed periods? Long periods? Possible premature menopause?

    Many of us FABs have long preferred female doctors because of the better knowledge FAB doctors have for the female reproductive system. Not because of transphobia FFS.

    So stoopid, it burns.

  2. maria permalink
    July 10, 2009 9:16 am

    Thank you! I thought I was in some bizarro world when I read that post and all of the ‘FAB’s are transphobic’ comments. Am I overreacting to these feministe and feministing posts? I feel like they should be more responsible because a general feminist blog search goes straight to them. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to even look at. It’s as if mainstream feminism has been taken over by patriarchal tools in the guise of logical women. It makes me think things are getting worse and that I need to stop reading those sites altogether.

    Here’s a charmer:
    http://www.feministing.com/archives/016582.html

    The defense of porn is sickening, not even based in any real argument.

    • July 10, 2009 4:35 pm

      Maria you fought a good fight over there, unfortunately, it has been ignored. The Jessica’s of the world (and her ilk) are not feminists but as you say tools.

      Yes, there was no real argument, it was all just “WHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAA I won’t be able to legally watch degrading scenes of women in a country I will probably never visit. The author could had least tried to make a Muslim tie-in. I’ve read somewhere that many eastern Europeans are afraid Muslims are taken over. Not that a history of Christianity has proven much better.

  3. July 10, 2009 10:26 am

    Yes, it reminds me of that deal with brownfemipower a little while ago/still on-going, where the tranz were demanding entry to a Katrina-relief medical clinic for poor women in New Orleans. The thing I kept reading over and over again was how men with their penises cut off deserved the “same” health care women got. On what fucking planet!? Those men need to get themselves to a urologist, not a gynecologist. And women’s facilities ought not be made to foot the bill for services no female person would ever need.

    All of the women supporting those deluded assholes ought to be ashamed of themselves.

  4. July 10, 2009 2:33 pm

    Not to mention that presumably a women-only pharmacy would exist partially to counter the right-wing blather about how pharmacists shouldn’t have to “go against their beliefs” to provide health care to women. Women need to know where they can go to get their birth control, emergency contraception, or what have you, without being hassled or sent off because the god-bothering pharmacist is on duty that day. Again, transwomen have problems, but an unwanted pregnancy ain’t one of ’em.

    • July 11, 2009 1:32 am

      For real, and do you want to guess how many comments were posted on the original article about the woman’s only pharmacy before some man came in whining about “what if I needed to talk about ED, shouldn’t I have my own male only pharmacy so I can feel comfortable.” Oh, for the love of somebody, if I never hear about ED again it would be too soon.

  5. July 10, 2009 5:36 pm

    @ Maria

    I saw that post yesterday, but I am not surprised that these women support porn. These are the same women that love being “submissive” by getting their asses kick,whipped by their male partners during sex. These are the same women that you can hardly have a conversation w/o someone being accused of some sort of “ism” or “phobia”. These are the same women that were upset that no males were considered for Supreme Court Justice. They allow men to comment and these men defend themselves by minimizing our issues and women always jump to their defense. Always.

  6. melim permalink
    July 10, 2009 7:12 pm

    To [FAB] feminists, when you are building new resources, what do you gain by excluding [MTF-F].

    Not having to deal with your delusional, entitled asses?

    Is that gain worth the harm you cause [MTF-F]

    Dunno, why don’t you leave women the hell alone so we can find out?

    Is that not status quo with the rest of the patriarchal world – to see [MTF-F] as disposable, valueless and not worthy of protecting

    And you’re taking that up with women because…?

    – and shouldn’t feminism be doing better?

    Probably, but not for YOU.

  7. July 10, 2009 9:10 pm

    Not having to deal with your delusional, entitled asses?

    Ha, melim! This benefit cannot be overstated.

  8. Imaginary permalink
    April 24, 2010 12:06 pm

    Wow, I am sooo glad I found this site. I have never understood the whole tranny thing, it just doesn’t make sense. If I superglued a clump of dog hair to my scalp, I wouldn’t be a werewolf. Turning your penis inside out doesn’t make you a womyn; it makes you a self-mutilator.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: