Skip to content

The List Grows

September 17, 2009

Looks like another “trans ally” who sucks MTF-F dick (or butterflied and tacked back dick) did not do her job well enough. Shocking I know, because ain’t nobody on the internet has ever sucked dick with the vitality and determination as Ms calling folks hateful bitches and Oreos has.

It just goes to show you, SUCKING DICK AIN’T ENOUGH! MTF-Fs are men. They want full submission from women. They want full subservience from women. They want full loyalty from women. Regardless of how many women suck their dicks, they want more; they demand that absolutely (<—pay attention to the meaning of this word) every single woman on the planet suck their dicks.

Sounds like they are behaving like what they are, —men.

My contribution? A big ol’ LMAO!

15 Comments
  1. September 17, 2009 3:26 pm

    Mtf Men want the convenience of using their own drugged and mutilated bodies to rape the very idea of WOMAN.

    dirt

    ps a few articles some here my find interesting

    http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/2042/full

    http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/2041/full

    • September 17, 2009 10:23 pm

      I just read those articles, Dirt, and I have to say that one of my least favorite things is a white man pontificating about the fact that other men in other places are misogynist. Whatever “freedom” women have here is directly dependent upon the wealth and relative comfort of the West. It’s not something Western men just decided to hand over to women, out of the noble kindness of their hearts; certainly not because it was ordained in Western religions. And the wealth of the West is, of course, dependent upon the poverty of colonized and oppressed people. Colonized and oppressed men have less to offer women in exchange for the use of female flesh – unlike Western men, who have women loudly proclaiming their undying right to strip and prostitute themselves. So, the men in places where resources are scarce are more inclined to corral their chattel more strictly (not saying only poor men keep tight reigns on their chattel, but it seems to me white males would rather have us focus on tight reigns to the complete omission of the fact that a loose reign is still a leash). White males always want to talk about how brutal these other men are, and how Western women just aren’t doing anything about it, but they never talk about what Western white males would be like in conditions of famine, of illness, of chaos, of bare scratching and scraping by – that is, in the breakdown of the social order.

    • atheistwoman permalink
      September 18, 2009 1:16 am

      And that list bit is what I live in constant terror of…And it will happen for us (in the US. For the most part it hasn’t yet, because IMO in short-term disaster situations people tend to stay within “acceptable behavior norms,” granted the bar for those is too low but anyway, simply because there is some certainty that society will return to normal soon, and you can still be arrested and such-like).

      “A loose reign is still a leash.” damn straight.

  2. September 17, 2009 4:20 pm

    It really is crazy. I mean, these women go to such lengths to earn the good graces of these males, and they keep going back for more. The only thing the women get out of it is a pat on the head whenever there are separatists around who don’t suck up to the males. As soon as the separatists are out of mind for a bit, though, all of a sudden there are no pats on the head for the women who’ve gone out of their way to distinguish themselves from us in those males’ eyes.

    Oh, well. I suppose this is the way it will always be with male-identified female people

  3. September 17, 2009 6:55 pm

    Love how the trans-ally was quick to apologized for wielding “cis-privilege”.
    Have you received an apology Marge?

  4. September 17, 2009 7:34 pm

    Sure haven’t, Rose. But, then, I’ve never had a penis, so I guess that’s to be expected.

  5. joankelly6000 permalink
    September 17, 2009 7:47 pm

    Well I’m sure all the people who are rushing in to point out the gross injustice of using bigoted language against someone just because you don’t like them, no matter how shitty the person you don’t like supposedly is…I’m sure those justice-seekers just didn’t *see* that other thread. What a field day for fairness it would have been if they had! There’s that comfort at least.

    • September 17, 2009 10:20 pm

      Joan, girlllllllllllllllllllll, what are you doing over here, they going to get you.

    • joankelly6000 permalink
      September 17, 2009 10:24 pm

      pshh, most of whoever they are don’t know or care that I’m alive, and anybody else, well, already knew I felt that way about the bitch/oreo thread, cuz I said so there as I recall. Also, wtf, everybody but me gets to have controversial friends!!! eff that.

  6. Mary Sunshine permalink
    September 17, 2009 9:39 pm

    Where is this happening?

    😕

  7. September 17, 2009 11:19 pm

    Question. When has the use of the word “Narcissistic” become transmysogynistic?

    • September 18, 2009 11:25 am

      When it became useful for transexuals to bash feminists over the head with it?

  8. September 18, 2009 11:24 am

    See, what I don’t get is how you can believe in male privilege and the power of male supremacist socialization (which Renee does) and then think it disappears the second you leave the house in make-up and heels for the first time. She’s written before that gay men still have male privilege, so she clearly doesn’t believe homophobia cancels out privilege. Doesn’t make sense.

    I generally like Renee, but it’s like she has some weird blind spots (the other main one being the common “sex-positive” flaw, where racism and misogyny in media and pop culture are picked apart and criticized in every aspect except for porn, which is above criticism).

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: