“Domestic Violence” (Fabricated Domestic Violence) Against Heterosexual Men is Hilarious!
All you nice little women lined up to campaign for the poor menz, the line for cookies is over to the right. Bon appétit.
God sende hem soone a verray pestilence! –Chaucer’s, The Wife of Bath
How in the hell is what Chris Brown actually did to Rhianna compared to what is speculated that Elin Nordegren did to Tiger Woods? Key words to compare are actually did and speculated, the former collective (Rhianna as a female victim of male violence) denotes proof reinforced by history, the latter collective (Tiger Woods as a male victim of female violence) denotes no proof with little to no history. Place in context with reality and in the imaginations of male identified whiners, we have men actually beating women equal to women occasionally communicating outrage.
Alert Homeland Security, men are in jeopardy of getting bruised egos because a few women lose their patriarchal constructed feminine composure and animatedly express how they did not particularly like a male partner sticking his fucking dick in not one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, but nine and counting other women after promising not to.
She raised her voice, –and ran after him, ——————“AH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE! YOU FEMALE DEMON, YOU NEED ANGER MANAGEMENT LIKE YESTERDAY!”
There is nothing wrong with laughing at an unreality.
“Domestic violence” (fabricated domestic violence) against heterosexual men “inflicted” on him by his heterosexual female partner is hilarious because it is a FANTASY that patriarchal institutions will never allow to become a reality! If you have not noticed, men have the power. Humor seekers are free to consume harmless fantasies that do not reflect reality. In other words, ripe apples and plastic oranges. Domestic violence against women is not “domestic violence” against men. To interchange the two is a disservice to all the women who have been battered by men.
That is why when an opportunity arises to laugh, it is an opportunity that I have no shame partaking. As a child, I laughed my ass off at Andy Capp when his wife met him at the door. After sucking down suds after suds that he could not possibly afford, Andy Capp went home wasted every single night. Hark, the luxury of stumbling home drunk without being molested. Each break of dawn that Capp staggered home meant an inferred morning that he would not be up and looking for work, –an activity that provides men with more money than it does for women. Yes, it is hilarious watching his dispirited wife get a good lick in with a heavy patina-perfect skillet on his big fat singular-minded head. If she is going to be stuck with him (and often stuck is the operative reality), she needs a coping mechanism. How is it that he can drink money away, not work, and insist on being emotionally unavailable, and it is side splitting when he falls off a bar stool or reacts bug-eyed at her hair rollers. Yet, suddenly, it is not funny when she mitigates her pain and suffering? If he had hit her (which would always be more violent and severe than anything a woman ever does to a man), the first assumption would be that she provoked him. It would be surmised that she deserved her fate because she was not cleaning or cooking well enough, or economizing properly, and/or that she had committed an indiscretion.
Little skits about Tiger Woods on Saturday Night Live pleading for help are hilarious. It is hilarious because the reality of it is an unreality. Tiger Woods has over a billion dollars. Tiger Woods had his wife sign a prenuptial agreement. In a patriarchy, Tiger Woods can get up and leave any minute he pleases and not for once worry about where he is going to live, how he is going to pay for food, shelter, and clothing, nor does he has to worry about the social stigma of leaving his children with the female parent.
“And and and and everyone knows that nothing is considered important or a worthy cause unless it centers around men, so all you should stop laughing and let the world think that men get beaten up by women as often and to the same degree as women get beaten up by men, and then just maybe, just maybe, the menz might give a rat’s ass.”
Yeah, men will care enough by getting charges dropped against them by counter accusing women, and the patriarchal institutions will be on their side more so than they are now. Why? Because they are patriarchal institutions. Duh! People’s cries about the menz infer that domestic violence is not a worthy cause unless male victims can be identified in order to legitimize and justify public concern. In a male dominated society, public concern will always be utilized to benefit men first. Therefore, the act of worrying about men does nothing but preserve the status quo.