Skip to content

AROOO is the Queen of the World: We Here Have all the Power!

March 25, 2010

You are so not worthy of our existence.

28 Comments
  1. March 25, 2010 5:22 pm

    We are widely read, respected, quoted, and admired at the following sites. (No links provided though, they have not earn that status from us yet)!

    love-shy.proboards.com

    fstdt.proboards.com

    whygodwhy.org/forum

    makeupalley.com/board

    tvtropes.org/pmwiki

    I really wish they would try harder though. They have not managed to pay the mortgage here, although they all do seem to put their hearts into their little rants.

    Poor bastards. I shall go find a copy of The Little Engine That Could. Perhaps that will motivate them some more.

    And you know the darnest things get the oppressor up in arms. I grew up hearing “Shit Stain Brown” used as an insult. Black people were not brown. They were shit stain brown. Yet, call white people pus color and the oppressor loses his damn mind. One would think the oppressor would prefer to find the positive attributes of pus. Isn’t pus made up of White Blood Cells?

    Feeling insulted by pus revels the fragility of perceived superiority.

    • JenniferRuth permalink
      March 26, 2010 12:35 pm

      On the WhyGodWhy boards there is actually an internal argument going on because someone dared to point out that a lot of things you said were actually the truth!

  2. March 25, 2010 5:26 pm

    Lmbao Kitty!

    I love this!

  3. Mary Sunshine permalink
    March 25, 2010 5:30 pm

    Kitty, I *love* these photos you come up with!!!!!!

    😀

  4. March 26, 2010 2:53 am

    And these people keep leaving comments about how “sexist” I am, and saying I’m a hypocrite because I’m “supposed” to be “against sexism.” For one thing, I can’t even think of the last time I used the word “sexism.” I’ve always made a point to say very clearly that I oppose male supremacy. And for another thing, who do these people think they are to tell me what my agenda is “supposed” to be?

    • March 26, 2010 3:08 am

      I know, right. Didn’t you get the memo, the agenda is to support male supremacy, not assert your own ideology on your own blog in your own words.

    • March 26, 2010 3:09 pm

      I wanted to post something snarky and sarcastic but couldn’t stomach it.

      Of course its “sexism” they want to point out. All this talk of sexism is a friggin derail just like trannyism is. If we say sexist then the men have to be on the agenda because women can be sexist too! (Sticks out tongue)

      But when we call it plain just like it is: male supremacy, then it shakes things up. Then they cannot hide the truth of the matter,womens oppression cannot be reduced to some stupid fuckin tit for tat game! Its real, in your face raw truth that male supremacy is the goddamn problem and that males are the ones who created it!

      Why is it so damn hard for oppressors to fuckin own the shit? I mean really!?

    • Mary Sunshine permalink
      March 26, 2010 4:30 pm

      SOULSIS !!!

      Yessssssssss. I twigged to that real early in the game. Radical dykes said “patriarchy”, het women said “sexism”. Hell, het women have never been about *anything* but making trade-offs with men. Including the new heterosexualized “queer” women.

      I’ve never used the word “sexism”.

    • Mary Sunshine permalink
      March 26, 2010 4:31 pm

      Oh, and the primary heterosexual relationship is mother-son. Just sayin’.

    • March 26, 2010 6:05 pm

      Oh, and the primary heterosexual relationship is mother-son. Just sayin’.

      God, yes. It can’t be said often enough. I think it was the mommies-of-boys that took “patriarchy” from the radical dykes and started moaning about patriarchy hurting boys too and “preventing” their sons from becoming patriarchs. Ha.

      Soulsis, you have been on a roll lately. That is exactly what I was thinking.

    • March 26, 2010 6:44 pm

      I guess I have been on a roll. A comment roll though, I cannot put two thoughts together for my own damn blog lol. I need a co-moderator!

      I think it was the mommies-of-boys that took “patriarchy” from the radical dykes and started moaning about patriarchy hurting boys too and “preventing” their sons from becoming patriarchs. Ha.

      I don’t know how these people sleep at night knowing they’re raising would be rapists and abusers. I don’t doubt that patriarchy hurts boys, but that “too” shit is what aggravates the hell out of me. Like their pain is the same or as important as that of little girls. These boys “hurt by patriarchy” will also benefit from patriarchy when they become grown up patriarchs who slut about sexually abusing girls/women and then have daughters of their own whom they hope never meet a dirty fuck like their patriarchal daddies! OMFG! (I just threw up in my mouth a little)

      I remember being a little girl who watched her sperm donor be an abusive fucking patriarch who told his daughters not to date men like him, as he abused the fuck out of her mother and sisters and self in nearly every way. And these same “wonder dad’s” (gag) would be oh so offended when one day their little girls grow up to say FUCK MEN they’re all vile disgusting creatures and decide to partner with women instead… because deep down they would prefer our bondage in hetero foolery over our freedom absent of the same, even though they *say* they don’t want us to date/marry doods like them. (Totally missing the point that marriage is also harmful/wrong for women and the point isn’t just doods like them but all of em but what ever men won’t/don’t get that)

      But you know, we’re the ones who don’t make sense and are unfair and shit.

    • Pseudoadrienne permalink
      March 26, 2010 10:44 pm

      Oh yes, you should see how these “feminist” stay-at-home mothers vigorously defend–to the point where they want a fucking crown of thrones– the way they’re raising their little Nigels. “B-b-but, it’s my *choice* to be a SAHM–which is totally feminist– and my son(s) will surely never grow up to be a misogynist, patriarch, warmonger, an abuser/murderer of women and girls, or a rapist.” They place their sons on a pedestal, granting those boys even more privileges, and these women honestly *don’t* believe that their sons won’t grow up with even more of a sense of patriarchal entitlement to gain access to safe spaces for women?”I was raised by a feminist. So where’s my blowjob, b*tches?!” Fucking seriously…

    • March 26, 2010 5:10 pm

      Technically, women cannot be sexist. It is impossible under a male supremacy. Similar to how a black person cannot be a racist under white supremacy. It is impossible. But, using the word sexist and sexism has become pointless because the only definition that will be recognized and used as legitimating is the definition that men define. That is how it works in a male supremacy. Essentially, sexism and sexist has been hi-jacked and is being used just as stated above, tit-for- tat. And it is why these bastards cannot comprehend that their comments will not be posted here. They think, “Well we let [!] women comment at our place, it is only fair that we can comment at theirs.” But there it is. We are not the women who want to comment at their place. We are not the women who want to pretend everything is fair and square and ignore the elephant in the room. They cannot comprehend that there are women who don’t want to have to put up with their socially enforced supremacy. On the internet no less. It is one thing having to put up with shit in the tangible world, where one’s livelihood depends on it, and whole nother beast when it is somewhere that affords a choice (per se).

    • March 26, 2010 6:06 pm

      Yep. This is why I’m moving toward eliminating the term “racism” from my vocabulary as well. ‘White supremacy’ is much more precise.

    • March 26, 2010 6:19 pm

      YES! But oh watch out, be still my tongue if you fuckin call it that! You might have whole sites dedicated to you for calling it like it muthafuckin is!

      White ppl don’t WANT us to use the term white supremacy, they have made their boogyman and given us that and that alone can be white supremacist (KKK style racists.) But in reality, away from the fallacy white people made up about racism and white supremacism, it is white supremacist any time you do any fucking thing that is racist, period! ALL of it!

      Kitty, I know women cannot be sexist (just like I know black people cannot be racist, ya know the whole power thing oppressors [males/whites] seem to forget about), I was being sarcastic. I wouldn’t ever call a woman sexist.

    • March 26, 2010 8:54 pm

      Soulsis, I know you know and everyone who comments here knows and if she does not know, she is able to comprehend when it is put down in black and white. I suppose I was saying it more for the benefit of the idiot audience that has insisted on calling us sexist. It is like, “Dude, we cannot be sexist until/unless the power structure changes. Are you that fucking stupid or that unwilling to recognize reality?”

    • March 26, 2010 6:31 pm

      Mary, you’re right! Hetero women *are* the one’s who use sexism vs patriarchy. It sounds nicer. They’re also the ones who want to show constant “solidarity” (aka dick sucking) with men and how bad they have it.

      A friend of mine sent something around to a couple of us talking about how more men than women are abused and how she doesn’t feel bad when men hit women back cause some women deserve it. I said, make sure you let me know when your boyfriend punches you in the face because you deserved it so we can celebrate together. These damn male identified people make me sick. I guess you know by now, but yeah she is hetero.

      Is it really that hard to just say men suck? Is it? Is it so tough to say that the 100 million missing women wouldn’t be missing if not for male supremacy and patriarchy? Is it?

  5. March 26, 2010 3:17 pm

    Also not surprised that males and their fun girl cheerleaders are telling *you* what *your* focus should be. ‘Cause we *all* know it ain’t “equal” if men are excluded. had someone tell me once that if I thought I was equal I shouldn’t want special rights and should be held to the same standard as men are, oh how bad the dood bros have it! And if men were held to the same “standard” as women my we’d have a bunch of bitching and whining… kinda like the trannies! Oh the lamentation that would go on about all the “sexism” and unfair treatment.

  6. March 26, 2010 8:35 pm

    “I said, make sure you let me know when your boyfriend punches you in the face because you deserved it so we can celebrate together.”

    I know that it’s wrong for me to have the morbid sense of humor that I have. But that made me laugh out loud. Not at the situation or topic, just at how much I love well-placed, effective sarcasm.

    • March 26, 2010 8:49 pm

      Isn’t it absolutely ridiculous? It’s all well and good to suck dick until it’s fucking happening to them! This shit is bananas b-a-n-a-n-a-s!

      It’s not funny, but I laughed too! I was treated like I was sick or something… “I’d never do anything to make him hit me” fuckin idiot! What woman MAKES a man hit her? Some people are just totally fuckin clueless!

  7. March 26, 2010 8:57 pm

    Kitty I’m responding down here before the thread starts to look like a pencil lol!

    I kinda got that after reading your comment again, but had already hit send. lol I feel you though sista, it does need to be said again and again because men and their fun girl cheerleaders are friggin idiots and cannot get that sexism goes ONE WAY, and that racism is the same. It goes ONE WAY, not both ways. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 fuckin dollars!

  8. Valerie M permalink
    March 29, 2010 7:10 am

    I was raised by a feminist. So where’s my blowjob, b*tches?

    My worst fears summarised in a single sentence!

  9. March 31, 2010 4:26 pm

    Interesting discussion, re patriarchy vs sexism and the use of which words by whom.

    FTR, I am bisexual, and I have always used the word “patriarchy”– using the word “sexist” only as a descriptor, i.e.: “That movie was really sexist, don’t watch it.”

    Patriarchy is a word that keeps your eye on the ball, so to speak.

    On an email list some time ago, I was attacked for using the word (just as I was on the quasi-MRA blog “Feminist Critics”)– and I stood my ground. Patriarchy literally means “rule of the fathers” and is simply a fact. When the fathers no longer rule, I’ll stop using it.

    When they try to say the fathers don’t really rule (or whatever nonsense they are claiming), I tellem to count up all the heads of state and Senators and Popes and Bishops and Imams and Prime Ministers and CEOs and suchlike, and when women predominate, get back to me… and I will happily and delightedly stop using the term. Ha.

    Re: your newfound stardom. I won’t register, what are they saying?

    • March 31, 2010 5:54 pm

      The same old run of the mill crap: Misogyny

      We are crazy
      We need therapy.
      We need medicine.
      We must take too much medicine.
      We are scarred.
      Our children (if we have any) should be taken away.
      We should be held accountable for our ideology using the purist standards unlike other people who have other ideologies and are not held accountable for anything.
      We need some dick.
      Maybe we had too much dick.
      We are ugly hags who cannot even get other ugly hags.
      We were raped as children.
      We want to rape children.
      We have raped children.
      We don’t suck men’s dicks.
      We should suck men’s dicks and we would see clearer.
      We are evil, more evil than rapists.
      We are as bad if not worse than MRAs.
      We make Christian Fundamentalists look rational.
      Calling crackers pus colored is unacceptable but calling black people shit stained brown is just history.

      so on and so on.

    • atheistwoman permalink
      April 1, 2010 12:37 am

      So many admirers, so little time!

  10. April 1, 2010 4:27 pm

    Oh, that. ((yawns))

    I thought maybe it was something new and interesting!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: