Oh look, a letter from a martyr mom who double dog dares anyone to look at a photo of her daughter and assert that the doctor was doing her/his job by suggesting/recommending an abortion.
Just shut up already. Your sexism and abortion shaming is atrocious.
Healthy children without any disabilities require lots and lots of attention and care. More care than many people can provide emotionally, physically, and/or financially. To knowingly accept a disable child is knowingly burdening yourself. I’m not suggesting that babies who have been brought to full term and birthed should be murdered, so save it already with your deflection. To act like a disable child will not be an additional burden to already raising a child is a lie.
However, having a baby with Down syndrome is not perfection.
Having a reasonably healthy child and cursing them out every single day of their lives because child-rearing is overwhelming to you is not perfection.
Having a reasonably healthy child and loving them every single day is not perfection.
But this, this open letter to the physician is pure anti-abortion propaganda. Not to mention how it is a ploy to pit mothers (an women in general) against each other. What ammunition for the holier than thou mother who has to deal with a child with disabilities have to hurl at a mother who dares to complain when her child is reasonably healthy.
We get it, you are a saint. If your husband and family and you complimented you more and showed appreciation for your sacrifices (your choice), you wouldn’t need to post an open letter to the world uplifting yourself by attempting to shame a physician for suggesting an abortion (and by default shaming mothers who abort at the news of being pregnant with a disabled fetus).
Please shut up and go sit down somewhere.
How many times have you read, “Transwomen Are Women? Full Stop.” It’s like because it’s said, it is.
That’s not how it works. Saying it doesn’t make it so. Demanding that others believe it, doesn’t make it so.
If transwomen (males) are women, then why do they call themselves transwomen at all? Why is a distinction being used? Are they women or not? Of course the answer is, they are not women. They are not female. They cannot become female. Imagine taking your male dog or cat to the vet and asking the vet to make it into a female. The most the vet can do is neuter the dog. Other dogs will still know that it is a male dog. It may mistakenly get hump, but that happens to many dogs before any neutering happens.
I am a woman and I don’t have to say I am a transwoman first to say I am a woman. I am a woman and everyone around me knows that I am a woman. If I were to say that I am a woman, the people around me would wonder why I am saying it. Their first thoughts would be, “Tell us something we don’t know already, Mistress Obvious.” However, when social justice warriors (SJWs) and males say transwomen are women (“full stop.”) (LMAO, that final-esque declaration never gets old! LMAO!) what are they really saying?
When males (or others advocating for their lunacy) say, “Transwomen are women,” and then add “Full Stop,” what they are doing is priming you for the following exercise in mental contortion. It’s like giving you a moment to adjust your bearings. It’s a command and a warning too. It is saying you better change what you are saying and shut up or you will face their wrath, their threats of violence.
No wrath is like the wrath of a violent male reacting to others not giving him his way.
These males want what is available as both. As transwomen they maintain their male privilege, because saying “transwomen” is saying what? It is saying, “male who dresses like a woman.” The benefits and authority that comes with being male is retained. Then, pretending to be women they get to feed their delusion and benefit by having unquestioned access to female spaces. They will never say they are women without the preceding disclaimer of being a transwoman, because without the patriarchal male authority lending their lies power, they know people will dismiss them on the spot.
“Transwomen” are males. FULL STOP.
In a reaction post on his website: [http://www.abitchforjustice.com/2016/05/and-she-stepped-down-for-what.html] he refers to the black female civil-rights attorney as “lazy”, “uneducated”, and “a bitch”. Courtney-Evans also claims that no man in history has ever harmed another human being while “dressed as women”, stating:
“Perhaps someone should hep this biotch to the fact that THERE HAVE BEEN NO DOCUMENTED INSTANCES OF TRANSGENDER MOLESTATION, ATTACK OR IMPROPER APPROACH IN ANY LADIES’ ROOM ANYWHERE (even though there have been NUMEROUS reports that have made the news regarding cis-identified men raping/attacking women/girls/boys in areas that they have been allowed in, and NONE OF THEM WERE DRESSED AS WOMEN when they did)!!!! I invite ANYONE to post a documented contradiction to this!!!”
All I did was googled:
If you accept his challenge, please leave a link. These men are playing with the belief that if you assert a lie long and loud enough it will eventually become true.
I will tell you where all the gay men are. They are either vocally supporting the invasion of women spaces by pseudo-women or they are remaining silent and allowing people to interpret their silence as consent. When trannies are out of the male bath and locker room it is win/win for gay males. Western culture has basically accepted gay men (and there has never been the degree of violence directed toward gay males as there has been directed at women). Sure there are pockets of resistance, but even in those areas there isn’t violence against gay males. There is tolerance and sympathy for gay men, mostly I expect because almost everyone has that one gay relative. Asserting this observation does not imply that I begrudge gay men. Your sexuality is your own. It’s ridiculous that one has to constantly put in little disclaimers but with the nature of illiterates determined to jump to conclusions and/or take positions to the extreme, one must. However, I will assert that I find gay men to be terribly misogynistic. It benefits them just like it benefits heterosexual males. The male sex oppresses the female sex.
Trannies and gay men as a movement have a symbiotic relationship. Trannies piggy back on the gay movement to steal away sympathy. By persuading (or by not correcting the assumption) the majority that most trannies are gay, they are able to push their deviant agenda. We all know most trannies are middle-aged to geriatric heterosexual white males. My god, can you fucking believe that a horrible pig in a wig who stopped having sex with his wife (because she refused to fuck a man dressed as a caricature of a woman, and she remained in the house with him albeit in another room, probably because the poor soul trapped herself into relying on his income. Who knows) hired a surrogate to father a child (in his case twin girls) so he could have victims right in his home. No doubt he put on his full drag while raping those little babies (starting at 27 days old). Of course that wasn’t enough for his exhibitionism. No one could see him raping his daughters alone in his own room at home. So, he had to take it further and post it on the internet for all the other disgusting mentally unstable need to be put down pedophiles to view and masturbate to (while in drag of course). They say, trannies are harmless. This, mon amie, is only one little example of the depravity of these men. You cannot make males as a class the center of all things and then expect them to go quietly in the night. They will make themselves center stage and they don’t care to what extent they have to go. Nothing is too morally repugnant if the goal is to have everyone looking at them.
The symbitoical aspect of the gay male and heterosexual trannie male unfolds like this: Before trannies were able to get their agenda center stage, gay males were the target of male aggression in male restrooms. However, as acceptance increased, that violence decreased. Along came the heterosexual trannie (males with dicks intact who want to have penis in vagaina, (P-I-V) sex) and like the opportunistic narcissists they are, they decided to bank on the preconceived notion that violence would occur in male locker/rest rooms. Even though most trannie violence is due to a trannie lying to a heterosexual male when offering a PIV sexual encounter or a trannie double-dog daring someone to come at them (such as when a trannie is being obnoxious on public transportation). And even in those cases, the trannie is gay and often a minority and most certainly not the white heterosexual male who wants access to women and children. The victimized gay-trannie has been upheld as the poster child of trans-violence. When in fact the majority of trannies are not gay. Once again, white heterosexual males have exploited the black (and/or minority) plight and repurposed it for their advantage.
Therefore, the public has been hoodwinked. All of this brouhaha about potential violence in the men’s restroom is only a preconceived notion without any factual backing. Where are the receipts? It has not been proven that heterosexual males dressed in female garb will be attacked in male restrooms. Have you seen these “tall gurls?” Ain’t no body trying to fuck with them. Everyone knows they are crazy. Nevertheless, there are plenty of cases in which males dressed in typical women’s clothing have attacked women.
But the gay males remain silence on this issue. Why? Because they are allowing women to carry the burden. As long as the pseudo-women are in the female locker rooms and restrooms the attention will be off them. The possibility of conflating “feminine” male (not all gay males are feminine) with trannie will be non-existent in the male restrooms because the trannies will be over there with the women in women spaces causing them to suffer.
Apparently, the trans-“in need of professional medical attention, one with caring and compassionate psychiatric medicine and therapy without the agenda of leading patients down the living a lie will make your life better path-community suppresses any topic about regret. From links in the comment section at Gender Trender, I landed on a few articles that recommended books and stories about regret. I don’t care about regret, not as far as males go anyway. It is sad to read about a woman who has gone off the deep end and removed her breast and/or attempted to have a penis fashioned out of who knows what and/or pumped her body with horrible hormones. That is tragic. Tragic indeed. Reading about how one woman was so disgusted with herself that she took advantage of Belgian’s accommodating laws for euthanasia was horrifying. That’s the second euthanasia story I read in the past week. The first was about a woman so traumatized over childhood sexual assault that she chose euthanasia. How horrible of a life that male violence has made for these women that they chose death over living.
As far as human compassion goes, I do sympathize for a male who wakes up to realize the monumental mistake he has made in consenting to remove his penis. However, that is not my fight. I say this because I felt myself being sucked in (no one’s fault but my own, unless you consider the conditioning of my upbringing and existence in a patriarchal society) to wanting to raise the alarm for others like him. I’m sure these males had so many red flags along the way. Perhaps some flags were slapping them in the face repeatedly and their arrogance coupled with the predominately male medical community blinded them to the color red.
Probably the main culprits who actively suppress SRS regret are post-operative males who want to share their misery. And of course, the lie has to be taken to the bitter and wretched end. In addition, I suspect males who never undergo any type of surgery help with this suppression as well. Because they do have nefarious reasons and want to have examples to point to when they are trying to make their case to have access to females and children. Actually having surgery for most cross-dressers is nothing but yap. A red herring. A MacGuffin.
It’s hard to shock a woman or child with fake-vagina vs a penis. When parading around a female locker room (the new form of flashing) an erect penis can be counted on to be seen. Because instinctively, a woman and/or child will look away and get away, a post-op trans will find it more difficult to shock anyone with his surgical opening.
How many female flashers are out in the world?
Here is an article that demonstrates flashing as a no laughing matter after a male proves hurt by one. It is always like that, it is all a joke until a male is hurt by a flasher. And of course, males will be protected from these flashers when they are no longer in their restrooms and locker rooms but in the women’s locker rooms and restrooms. Having legal access to female restrooms and locker rooms means these males can flash women and children without repercussion. The article states that flashing is essentially the end of the road, –no harm, no foul. However, there have been many publications since that argument that flashing leads to more deviant and criminal behavior, such as physical and sexual assault. Here, here, and here. You could probably google some more and if you have access to an academic database find peer review articles asserting the same.
Actually since trannies are known to be violent, I will surmise that these unstable males are already beyond simple flashing. They are combination flasher and rapist. It is the shock and awe of sexual assault.
No wonder so many of them are ex-military.
The Charlotte Observer published an editorial that reads like a journal entry from a pedophile. However, after everyday citizens left rationale and thought-provoking comments that highlighted how the general population isn’t as stupid as many people want others to believe, but how creepy and predatory the editorial is, what does the Charlotte Observer do? They remove the comments and disable any further dialogue.
The veil has been removed. The Charlotte Observer is promoting predatory practices by allowing this garbage editorial to remain without comment. Their censoring is just half censoring, censoring the half who brings their agenda to the surface for all to see.
Who was it or where was it, the series, or maybe just one post or was it a comment, surely I haven’t imagined it. But wasn’t someone in the radfem-o-sphere blogging about how the trans-cult brings back the dead or re-purpose the dead to further their agenda? Ghosts, ghouls, and goblins, etc. I remember it was quite clever and hilarious. Forgive me for not remembering I go in and out of the blog-o-sphere sometimes for days and sometimes for months and a few times for years.
Anyway, I think this case belongs with the others. Where were those posts? Do you know?